tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27687583.post7709754679506984032..comments2023-09-25T09:21:02.368-05:00Comments on Truth in Justice Files: Additional Problems with Middle District of Florida U.S. Attorney NominationTruth in Justice Fileshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11287997013742675577noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27687583.post-16222193829332490212011-06-24T17:20:36.361-05:002011-06-24T17:20:36.361-05:00The Coram Nobis Appeal is at the 11th Circuit and ...The Coram Nobis Appeal is at the 11th Circuit and there should be a ruling in the next few weeks. A Spellissy vacation would be a bombshell on US Attorney O'Neill.Michael Collinsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27687583.post-67759361380966146462010-11-19T18:19:10.492-05:002010-11-19T18:19:10.492-05:00Just in.
Case Name: USA v. Spellissy et al
Case...Just in.<br /><br />Case Name: USA v. Spellissy et al <br />Case Number: 8:05-cr-00475-JDW-TGW <br />Filer: <br />Document Number: 225(No document attached) <br /> <br /><br />Docket Text: <br />ENDORSED ORDER granting Defendants' [220] Joint Motion for Leave to File. Within five (5) days of the date of this Order, Defendants shall electronically file the Joint Petition for Writs of Error Coram Nobis. The Government is directed to respond to the Petition within thirty (30) days of the date the Petition is filed. Signed by Judge James D. Whittemore on 11/19/2010. (KE)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27687583.post-59432886116310009822010-10-29T21:22:12.252-05:002010-10-29T21:22:12.252-05:00This case has been reopened. Judge orders the gove...This case has been reopened. Judge orders the government to respond. This will get interesting.<br /><br />USA v. Spellissy et al <br />Case Number: 8:05-cr-00475-JDW-TGW <br />Document Number: 221 <br />Docket Text: <br />ORDER directing the Government to respond to [220] MOTION for leave to file Joint Petition for Writs of Error Coram Nobis as to Thomas F. Spellissy, Strategic Defense International, Inc. Signed by Judge James D. Whittemore on 10/28/2010.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27687583.post-29713014856735358552010-09-23T13:44:59.841-05:002010-09-23T13:44:59.841-05:00More from the MDFL.
http://usat.me/?40258912
Thi...More from the MDFL.<br /><br />http://usat.me/?40258912<br /><br />This is how they operate in Florida.Michael Collinsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27687583.post-86233217076269959652010-08-28T11:41:45.827-05:002010-08-28T11:41:45.827-05:00Colonel Tom Spellissy is innocent and we all know ...Colonel Tom Spellissy is innocent and we all know it. There are soldiers dying every day by IEDs because Spellissy is sitting on the sidelines. The guy is a brillant soldier. O'Neill prosecuted the wrong guy and has been under fire ever since and we hope he goes down for convicting an innocent man. I am just stunned that O'Neill was even nomimated for the US Attorney job. This blog is great, professionally done and highlights the true criminal, Bobby O'Neill.Steve O'Haranoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27687583.post-32999802294655573012010-08-27T08:40:28.346-05:002010-08-27T08:40:28.346-05:00Below is an article on another O'Neill case wi...Below is an article on another O'Neill case with major issues concerning two constitutional violations by AUSA O'Neill against Wesley Snipes.<br /><br />http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2010/08/26/wesley-snipes-avoids-jail-a-little-longer/?icid=main%7Cmain%7Cdl5%7Csec4_lnk2%7C166335<br /><br />Snipes is now the the fourth (Gore-Dean, Del Fuoco, Spellissy) high profile case with issues concerning O'Neill's lack of ethics. The four victims of O'Neillism have the money and or education to fight back, what about those who don't and how many of them are out there.Michael Collins, Clearwaternoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27687583.post-19306642941443565922010-08-23T00:11:31.516-05:002010-08-23T00:11:31.516-05:00Many, MANY people have attempted to expose Robert ...Many, MANY people have attempted to expose Robert O'Neill and his criminal connections over the years. Reporters have been intimidated. Innocent citizens like myself have been stalked and through it all robert oneill and colin breen and four green fields just grow richer and seemingly more powerful and untouchable. <br />This is an <a href="http://tampa.creativeloafing.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A218421" rel="nofollow">article by John Suggs</a> which is about two years old and will fill in some gaps on the O'Neill saga.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27687583.post-24653104121795987172010-08-20T17:31:15.304-05:002010-08-20T17:31:15.304-05:00Okay, I'll get real AND play fair.
He (O'N...Okay, I'll get real AND play fair.<br />He (O'Neill) quite likely made all that up. "a number of attorneys and other blah blah yada yada" told him to protect himself. LOL. Come on what is he, A BABY?? He makes things up seemingly all the time. Evidence. Exoneration from arson for his buddies. Conversations. Evidence. Yes I mentioned that twice. ALL of those folks w/the Breen O'Neill krewe live in a meth-fueled and unlimited meth money fairytale. As much a badass as robert is and all those murders and gangbangers he and hsi buddy prosecuted and he's AFRAID OF another ATTORNEY?? That's just freakin FUNNY. Laugh out loud funny. Del Fuoco's throwing paper and Robert, unable to defend himself against THE TRUTH picks up a gun? And some more lies?<br />How's that for fair?? And very real. I KNOW THEM. I know what THEY ARE.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27687583.post-22103249350160742072010-08-20T02:12:15.472-05:002010-08-20T02:12:15.472-05:00Has anyone seriously looked at the flame thrower t...Has anyone seriously looked at the flame thrower to assess his credibility? And have you overlooked the stats on workplace violence? Is it more likely that a disgruntled employee would be the victim, or would he more likely be the perpetrator?<br /><br />Alleged threats by O'Neill to kick someone's butt sounds like mere locker room talk. On the other hand O'Neill, as I understand, had to take strong measures to defend himself from the potential threat of violence from the disgruntled employee.<br /><br />Play fair. Get real.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27687583.post-15196538893991019052010-08-18T13:55:37.072-05:002010-08-18T13:55:37.072-05:00as I've said before: The people who speak up a...as I've said before: The people who speak up against Robert E. O'Neill are not folks who have been wronged by him in the courtroom or even the workplace. I have never EVER met him personally and yet he has had people stalk and threaten myself and my family, one of whom displays cult-like behavior associated w/ the teenagers who are the main supporters of the Irish Republican Army. Like it or not, this is factual information. I have it documented and we are living it. Interesting thing is that once I expose them, name, tag #, location, sightings, they disappear to be replaced by yet another thug. Sometimes I only expose them in email and it stops. They read your email, they stalk you everywhere you go. So, Robert E. O'Neill not only will kick someone's teeth IN, he will send his corrupt partner, Colin Breen's wife, Chritine Breen out to stalk people whom he has never encountered in any setting legal or no. THIS is a display of all the signs of mob behavior and also a corruption and gang mentality on a level one normally only reads in "The Godfather". It's my humble opinion that people are better off to have their lives destroyed publicly rather than this sicko of a monster, O'Neill having his partner's wife threatening innocent people with inclusion on the sexual offenders' registry and other heinous things that I have documented. The courtroom venue gives you an avenue of approach which then reveals corruption on a higher level at times. Much like the corruption existing that O'Neill has gotten THIS far and is a criminal of the highest order wearing the cloak of a FEDERAL prosecutor. Selectively targeting some and ignoring the abuse and domestic terrorism foisted on others and even participating in it himself in a tertiary but thinly disguised manner. That exhibits a profound level of mental illness and psychosis. Unless people think that the Godfather was an angel. <br />If what I am saying is not TRUE, why would O'Neill not pursue me for defamation of character? Because I can prove it. But he's still not done trying to plant child porn on a computer and send it into my home with the help of Christine Breen and whatever thugs Colin has in his stolen mansion at night. The evidence EXISTS.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27687583.post-58685407850511421572010-08-18T13:32:04.700-05:002010-08-18T13:32:04.700-05:00Make that way more than three. The only reason I h...Make that way more than three. The only reason I have not filed suit is that there is only the rare attorney who will go up against these swine. NONE of them are available to me. So, guess what? Time for law school. The statute of limitations for RICO is long and flexible.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27687583.post-65604311364944879752010-08-18T10:06:36.375-05:002010-08-18T10:06:36.375-05:00In the case Thomas F. Spellissy v. Robert E. O'...In the case Thomas F. Spellissy v. Robert E. O'Neill, et al. CASE NO. 8:10-CV-1070-T-30AEP, O'Neill is being sued in his individual capacity. O'Neill is alleged to have given gave false statements to the Court and Jury during opening and closing arguments, not turning over exculpatory or impeaching evidence in discovery, falsely stating status of defendants, and misquoting government laws, regulations and policies in criminal Case No.08:-05-CR-475-T-27TGW . The government is also representing O'Neill in this civil case. In the criminal case there is also evidence of a witness being physically threaten by federal agents.<br /><br />I bring this to your attention of this blog becasuse there is a pattern of misconduct by O'Neill in three different and unrelated cases. I hope that a person in a position to do something about Assitant United States Attorney O'Neill's misconduct steps up and takes action. The victim of O'Neill's misconduct is a decorated combat veteran who stood up to politics, a good ole boy network and was made a scape goat in a cover-up. Hopefully, justice will be served to O'Neill.Michael Collins, Clearwaternoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27687583.post-1143371307689830282010-08-18T00:29:53.042-05:002010-08-18T00:29:53.042-05:00The Ermest Peluso in Del Fuoco's complaint is ...The Ermest Peluso in Del Fuoco's complaint is an attorney for david gee, the sheriff. I can't put hands on it now but there are unsavory activities associated with Peluso. Tom Gonzalez whom you will see named with him frequently is possibly the largest crook (no, not really but UP THERE) accepted into the Florida Bar. He is also the School Board Attorney. Bad bad reputations, these gentlemen. Google searches will probably reveal most of it .. I will come back with the links at another time.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27687583.post-69275883412353210812010-08-17T12:27:03.426-05:002010-08-17T12:27:03.426-05:00An example of absolute privilege is the ability of...An example of absolute privilege is the ability of legislators for actions and statements made during debates and in the course of their legislative work, without fear of being sued for defamation.<br />Jim, my understanding of absolute privilege may not be as cogent as a DOJ attorney's BUT am I given to understand that if Robert E. O'Neill came into my place of employment and attempted to incite other folks into doing me bodily harm or in any way cause me distress that it would be perfectly legal?? Or is this only true if I happen to visit his office and he attempts to get his fellow AUSAs to kick my teeth in? I need to know. I had NO idea that a prosecutor could just go about threatening people bodily injury and the judicial body would say, 'hey, that's ok.'. Please expand on the definition of absolute privilege at your earliest convenience. It would seem that at all cost anyone should avoid Robert E. O'Neill who apparently could kick their teeth in or have someone in his office do so and that's his 'absolute privilege.' That is very scary for a layperson.<br />I do not know nor am I even vaguely acquainted with Jeffrey DelFuoco but what a scary thing to happen in a workplace where there are numerous laws in place to protect one.<br />How is O'Neill able to get by with this? Was threatening bodily harm to a subordinate part of a legislative duty? I am honestly befuddled by this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com