tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27687583.post5150565862061584175..comments2023-09-25T09:21:02.368-05:00Comments on Truth in Justice Files: Duke University: So Little, So LateTruth in Justice Fileshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11287997013742675577noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27687583.post-49124541040986260702007-01-05T16:13:00.000-05:002007-01-05T16:13:00.000-05:00Duke Lacrosse Rape Accuser Mentioned No Condoms We...<b>Duke Lacrosse Rape Accuser Mentioned No Condoms Were Used</b><br /><br />The stripper’s body was completely void of any sign of a sexual assault, the innocent boys were devoid of any scratches, bruising, or marks, and the alleged crime scene was completely devoid of DNA that would be expected in a violent gang rape. <br /><br /><i>It is impossible that a crime scene with three drunk men in a small enclosed room with a fighting and clawing woman being orally, virginally, and anally penetrated not leave any DNA evidence of urine, blood, vaginal fluid, sweat, fecal matter, scat smears, saliva, tears, or semen... especially if condoms were used. How would they take off the condoms during all this chaos without spilling, smearing, or touching the content inside or outside of the condom?</i><br /><br />When investigators questioned the stripper after DNA tests on the semen from multiple men found inside her vagina and rectum didn’t match any of the Duke players on the entire lacrosse team, the stripper admitted to having had sex with at least three men around the time of the alleged rape including her boyfriend and two men who drove her to Duke.<br />The DA Mike Nifong didn’t talk to the prostitute about her wild claims of gang rape, in which she described in great detail, claiming no finders or any other objects were used to penetrate her, yet Nifong did conspire with the DNA lab owner to hide evidence that proves the three victims of this lie are innocent.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com